Inigo Cervantes vs Jan Hajek Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W L W L L L
Form
L W W W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Cervantes 1 - 0 Hajek
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cervantes winning 2 and Hajek winning 1. The last match between Cervantes and Hajek was at the Trnava Challenger, 24-09-2011, Semifinals, Clay with Inigo Cervantes getting the victory 3-6 6-4 4-1 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Inigo Cervantes | 1 |
| Jan Hajek | 0 |
Trnava Challenger(24-09-2011)
3
6
6
4
4
1
| Cervantes | Stats | Hajek |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 898 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 71 |
| 35 | Age | 41 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 12 | Titles | 13 |
| 56% (432-339) | Career Total W/L | 59% (395-275) |
| $308,293 | Career Prize Money | $314,430 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. |
Stats 
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Jan Hajek
48%
(
38 of
79)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 11 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:47:29 | Average Match Time | 1:47:29 |
| 48% (38/79) | 1st Serve % | 62% (45/73) |
| 74% (28/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (28/45) |
| 54% (22/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (14/28) |
| 50% (4/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 42% (31/73) | Return Points Win % | 37% (29/79) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Inigo Cervantes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Inigo Cervantes
52%
(
39 of
75)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
87)
1
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
6
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
44%
(
16 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
80
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gerard Campana Lee
Player
Inigo Cervantes
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve %
36%
(
18 of
50)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
10 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi
Player
Inigo Cervantes
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Giorgio Ricca
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
10
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Inigo Cervantes
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Oscar Jose Gutierrez
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
75%
(
45 of
60)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Gastao Elias
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
14 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Inigo Cervantes
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
26 of
33)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
14 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Inigo Cervantes
Player
Ignasi De Rueda De Genover
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Jan Hajek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(11) 7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-1 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 0-6 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (432/339) | Win/Loss | 59% (395/275) |
| 54% (1004/840) | Sets Win/Loss | 58% (878/633) |
| 52% (9178/8524) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7347/6605) |
| 55% (66/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 41% (28/40) |
| 58% (349/257) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (310/173) |
| 35% (11/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (56/57) |
| 43% (6/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) |
| 0.3 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 2615 | Aces Total | 1047 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1525 | Total Double Faults | 567 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 559.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 588.42 |
| 52% (17476/33323) | 1st Serve % | 64% (13794/21580) |
| 72% (12616/17476) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9096/13794) |
| 48% (7677/15847) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3983/7786) |
| 43% (1331/3106) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (897/2111) |
| 39% (12722/32470) | Return Points Win % | 40% (8616/21713) |
| 34% (11/21) | Slam W/L | 37% (13/22) |
| 33% (6/12) | Masters W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 60% (6/4) |
| 45% (40/48) | Main Tour W/L | 47% (61/69) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (214/170) | Challenger W/L | 64% (275/156) |
| 65% (161/88) | Futures W/L | 69% (34/15) |
| 56% (422/747) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (379/614) |
| 33% (6/18) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (10/30) |
| 47% (127/268) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (114/195) |
| 53% (152/285) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (84/162) |
| 82% (413/340) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (404/354) |
| 18% (413/73) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (404/46) |
| 25% (358/91) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (266/38) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
